Wednesday, July 5, 2017

H.E.W. (the Motion Picture)

Overdue Update: I am now incorporating previously explored concepts in New Trinity Dawn with HEW, my groundbreaking theory of EH-VREE-THING. I'm now suggesting that Michael M. from Neptune Beach, FL (if he's still alive and still watching) come back into the fold for a look at H.E.W. and see what he thinks. It would be a "meta" version of HBO's Westworld (referenced in the write-up below). Bottom line: we exist inside a simulation. Someone's running it. Just like the story I wrote in 6th grade called "Rude Awakening" and just like the "V.R. WORLD" (aka New Trinity Dawn) script I started writing in the early 90s - yes, absolutely PRE-DATING the freakin' Matrix Boys by, if you take the 6th grade story into account, DECADES. Here's my statement of beliefs and, trust me, HOW EVERYTHING WORKS would make a great movie. Hope all is well with you and yours! Bests, Jim W-N (Tranquility, NJ, USA)

p.s. - this can also be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NLxnty86lQlDwM6cHu-clEKz1ZhTPXqExCW5YVORLDE

Here you go...

ALL CONTENTS *** DRAFT ***  (until I say otherwise)

How everything works (H.e.w. aka #HEW) --- V.07
Last Update: 7/7/2017

(raw source, needs pagination, section identifiers, Table of contents, etc. etc. etc. - see edit notes for details )

ENTIRE CONTENTS: © 2017 Jim Ward-Nichols

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jim Ward-Nichols
Date: Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:11 PM
Subject: Just a pretty picture (well, not *just*)

Is this the right email address for you???

I hope so!!!

Check this out (read first email in the chain and then go up from the bottom).

This is the VERY LATEST on where our heads are at re: the Holographic Multiverse system (HMS), etc.

Any questions, let us know!

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Jim Ward-Nichols" <jlwn111@gmail.com>
Date: Mar 3, 2016 18:01
Subject: Just a pretty picture (well, not *just*)

> Hi.
>
> If you need to, you can re-read this 50K-foot summary and then start from the bottom of the chain again.  
>
> How Everything Works (H.E.W.) ~ We’re woven into one of the gazillion copies of the Holographic Multiverse System. This system was designed to appear infinitely large and impossibly old but is, at most, between 7,000 and 10,000 years old.  [This Holographic Multiverse System] is a tiny fraction of the size that the best and brightest minds believe it to be.  We are “mere projections” who experience 2D as “solid” and we live inside an enclosed box with boundaries that we call “The Infinite Universe”.
>
> All interactions between sentient beings on this planet (and their life circumstances in general) are entirely shaped by each being’s DNA Capability Set (DCS) and how that DCS has interacted with every other DCS (ever) since that being was born, even while the being was in the womb. Growth/Evolution (of the being itself and every single one of the being’s ancestors) is entirely governed by gazillion-variable “wave-function”- like equations, and there are different sets of equations running the show for each set of beings (down to the tiniest insect) inside each of the copies of the holographic multiverse system. It’s a highly choreographed free-for-all! And it’s mind-boggling! And I just love it!

Closest analogy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychohistory_(fictional) (but on a sub-atomic level - with everything tracked “as low as it goes”)

Also - HBO’s Westworld (the details of “how everything works” inside the park - how the characters interact and adapt) - this is also related to the broader H.E.W. theories at play inside our copy of the holographic multiverse system.

BTW - in case you were wondering - in the early weeks (months? years?) of the Construction/Creation of our copy of the Holographic Multiverse, things were run on "fast forward" just like you used to be able to do with Sim City creations. Each Unique Copy of the Multiverse - and there are GAZILLIONS of them, mind you - has to have a realistic "layering" of Discoverable Data so its inhabitants remain convinced of its INSANE age (you know, how it's bill-yunnns and bill-yunnns and bill-yunnns of years old --- OMG, LOL!!!).

TheMap.png
“Ford’s New Narrative” & its surroundings (from HBO’s Westworld)

>
>
> And here we go with the "catching you up" part! (but remember - start from the bottom!!!)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Jim Ward-Nichols" <jlwn111@gmail.com>
> Date: Mar 3, 2016 2:18 PM
> Subject: Just a pretty picture (well, not *just*)
>
> > Nice theory, but I'm thinking that even the notion of "friction" is "oh so 3-D/2-D" and "just a pretty picture" (that - AMAZINGLY ENOUGH - tests positive to us Holographic Elements for so-called "friction").
> >
> > [Oh look! I added Blair!]
> >
> > On Mar 3, 2016 1:55 PM, " wrote:
> > >
> > > There's an infinite amount of energy available anyway; it's generated by the inter-dimensional "friction" between the infinite HOLOGRAPHIC multiverse SYSTEMs (which are all simultaneously adjacent to eVERY other COPY)...
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > From: Jim Ward-Nichols [mailto:jlwn111@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 10:26 AM
>
> > > Subject: RE: Oh, and also (re: "amounts" of "energy")
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > > Please do!
> > >
> > > Sounds like a fitting analogy!
> > >
> > > But again, the notion of "how much energy" it takes to build even one copy of a fully interactive Holographic Multiverse system is a question we are asking ourselves from our very limited 3-D/2-D experience set.
> > >
> > > In fact, from that perspective, this whole discussion is throttled by that. But it's still fun to ponder!
> > >
> > > ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > You should read "The Hydrogen Sonata" by Iain M. Banks. Among other things, there's a discussion about any sufficiently detailed simulation, i.e. one involving interactions between autonomous A.I.'s, becoming indistinguishable from reality and the associated moral implications. I'll scan & post the section if you're interested.
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > > From:  
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11:44 PM
> > > > To: Jim Ward-Nichols
> >
> > > > Subject: Re: Oh, and also (re: "amounts" of "energy")
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > > It's like late night in the dorm room.  <3 span="">
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mar 2, 2016, at 9:00 PM, Jim Ward-Nichols <jlwn111@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Quick p.s. - methinks “outside the box” science and math would seem like magic to us. The “outside the box” concept of Energy - even the notion of a fixed amount - may be wildly different than ANYTHING our “inside the box” 3-D/2-D brains could ever hope to comprehend. Nothing against us. Hey, we do the best we can (as fully interactive and sentient Holographic Elements in our copy of the holographic Multiverse system). Anywho... let's "hash it all out" some night LIVE! Might be interesting!
> > > >>
> > > >> Cc-ing my amazing friends and former AT&T co-workers Lisa and John into this loop as well. Yay!
> > > >>
> > > >> Have a good night, everyone!
> > > >>
> > > >> Your Pal,
> > > >> Jim
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mar 2, 2016 5:15 PM, "Jim Ward-Nichols" <jlwn111@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > We need to do a conference call!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > :-)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > One quick response: our notion of "how much energy" it takes to create "real" V. "Holographic Multiverse Simulation" is most certainly skewed since this cosmology I am proposing has no real frame of reference (especially the Multiverse part of it). How the projection and detection system actually works - how it is constructed - is beyond me. The closest analogy is the holodeck: http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Holodeck
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >  
> > > >> >
> > > >> >  
> > > >> > Hmmmm.... a bit cavalier in throwing around the word "must"... infinite holographic multiverse systems imply infinite computing power and infinite storage volume therefore it seems as though everything would be rendered in real time without the requirement of any "warehousing." Storing the data and rendering it separately would be double work so much simpler if the rendered object is its own data. If this is the case, it seems the "next step" data contained in each rendered object would be the resultant vector of a semi-random algorithm influenced by its own data iteration and those of the other rendered objects. Any other "next step" instructions imply either pre-determination or the intervention of a superior being. Of course it might take less energy for the hologRAPHIC multiverse SYsTEMS to simply create actual objects instead of rendered ones...
>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >  
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Yes! An infinite amount (infinite from our perspective, of course, but capped at a level sufficient for the appearance of "fluid motion"). As a reminder: our copy of the Holographic Multiverse system exists inside what amounts to a closed box with distinct boundaries - we refer to this as "The Infinite Universe"  ;-)
>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >  
> > > >> >> > >> >
>
> > > >> >  
> > > >> >> > >> >
> > > >> >  
> > > >> >
>
> > > >> > ________________________________
>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Subject: Re: Fwd: The "Specified Location Indicators"...
> > > >> >
> > > >> >  
> > > >> >
> > > >> > A quick question... or two...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > If the info in the “holo une” (our copy of the Holographic multiverse system) is rendered at every instant in time, then doesn't that require an infinite amount of rendering? Or is time not continuous but rather a series of imperceptibly small time units all strung together?
> > > >> >
> > > >> >  
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Speaking of rendering, isn't it time for a pulled pork sandwich or a savory dish of beef stew?  As I understand, it's what's for dinner.  Beef… it's a dead cow.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >  
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ________________________________
> > > >> >
> > > >> > From: Jim Ward-Nichols <jlwn111@gmail.com>
> > > >> > Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 2:32 PM
> > > >> > Subject: Fwd: The "Specified Location Indicators"...
> > > >> >
> > > >> >  
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Something for you all to ponder when you have a moment...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > >> > Date: Mar 2, 2016 14:26
> > > >> > Subject: Fwd: The "Specified Location Indicators"...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Slight change to some of the nomenclature... wanted to make sure you were in the loop cuz I know you care very deeply about our copy of the Holographic Multiverse system!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > If you have any questions, please do reach out!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Loveya,
> > > >> > > Jim
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > >> > > Date: Mar 2, 2016 14:14
> > > >> > > Subject: Fwd: The "Specified Location Indicators"...
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Some musings I've been sharing...
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > >> > > > Date: Mar 2, 2016 14:11
> > > >> > > > Subject: The "Specified Location Indicators"...
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > Hiya!
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Just to recap the part of my theory that I shared with you the other night:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Since everything in our copy of the Holographic Multiverse system must be "rendered" in some fashion at every instant in time, there must be a known location within the projection that is warehoused to be used in calculations for the next "rendering" (and this rendering happens so quickly it appears as fluid motion to our senses).
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > What do I call the data associated with the location of the holographic Element within the overall projection inside our copy of the holographic Multiverse system? I call this data the Specified Location Indicators. It not only warehouses the spatial coordinates of the Element, it  contains Next Step data as well (and who knows what else).
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > And here's the kicker: this tracking occurs at the lowest level of observable matter (all the subatomic particles, “all the way down”, “as low as it goes”, etc. ). And it occurs in every single one of the gazillion copies of the Holographic Multiverse system.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > How 'bout them apples?
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > LOL!
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >  
>
>




















###

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

It's been a while!

So... here you go:


The backstory.